Terrific News About The Ultra-Spinnable Articles
Many things have happened these last few days here, and I’m glad to tell you that, finally, we have found extremely good writers for our ultra spinnable articles. And I do mean it.
I also want to let you know that something huuuge is coming beginning of February: Product Reviews in the form of Ultra Spinnable Articles!
Basically what does it mean for you? It means that with each of those articles you will be able to build thousands of backlinks per month to get high rankings for your websites (as explained in “From 0 To Profits“) and at the same time the unique content broadcasted to hundreds of different websites and that is used to build those backlinks can have your own affiliate links embeded to make you money in the process – or put simply:
These articles will make us money while improving our rankings!
Here is a short sample of 2 variations coming from 1 Ultra Spinnable Review Article:
Variation 1:
Clickbank Pirate has been highly recommended by many online marketers as one of the best money making products out there only for two simple reasons: Simplicity and Effectiveness. The system shows you that it is possible for you to make money even without your own website or having your own product. They made the system so easy, and simplified it to such an extent that anyone with even basic Internet marketing skills can make at least a thousand dollars a month. It’s literally plug and play.
Variation 2:
Clickbank Pirate is by far one of the most advanced and at the same time the simplest programs to help you make money online, without wasting years. The set up is already done for you, you just need to sign up (which is quick and easy) and start your marketing process to drive traffic to the readymade websites. These sites don’t take time to set up. As soon as you sign up; they’re ready to be promoted. What’s more, you also have a blog with automatic blog posts done – where you don’t even have to lift a finger. In simple words, the system fulfills most of the work that it takes to launch a profitable affiliate marketing campaign.
Incredible isn’t it?
Each ultra spinnable review article can produce about 116,415,321,826,934,814,453,125 unique variations so we will all be able to profit from them!
— But there is a counter part —
The big problem for us was to find talented writers who could write so many variations each and every day.
And this… we have not really found it. So we had to come up with another solution, and here it is:
Instead of having 3 writers per day to work together to write 1 single ultra spinnable article, we have expanded the team and reduced the workload of each individual writer.
Each writer of the production chain is highly skilled. And now most of them are Americans.
This leads to an important side effect though: the cost of production is much much (did I say much?) higher.
The only viable solution I have to be able to run this service with the very high quality standard we are all after is to increase the limit from 100 members to 300 members per slot.
I personally prefer the 1st solution because those reviews would make us direct money in addition to helping us building backlinks.
Also keep in mind that the number of unique variations that each one of these articles can produce is high enough to support this number, even more! (each article can produce about 116,415,321,826,934,814,453,125 unique variations)
Now let’s say that on average 1 Ultra Spinnable Review Article makes you just 1 tiny little and shy affiliate sale per month. Since you receive one each and every day, at the end of your first month how much money could you make? (And this would just be an added benefit to the thousands of backlinks coming from unique content you would create)
After voting, please write a comment below to explain the reason of your choice.
PS: The reviews would mainly target internet marketing products, most of them being clickbank products but not all of them. We might also send 1 or 2 Ultra Spinnable Reviews per week targeting other niches.
Hey, sounds good. How much higher would it be though?Cheers
Rob, for the current members it will be the same price. You would just be moved to the new subscription list.
Hi Vita ,I have most definately voted for option one as I can see the absolute potential in this Especially since I am using a different software than the one you demonstrate on Zero to Profits. It will fit in perfectly with the strategy that I am using. I have one question tho will it be purely IM product reviews from clickbank as per example or will it be from other sources also.Another question I have is will it switch to only product reviews or will you still include a mix of pure IM articles also because although there are many affiliate networks offering IM products sooner or later you will run out of products to review.Also will the reviews be of products that are closed now such as many of the high end products eg the recent "magic bullet system" which would only have backlink benefit not product sales benefits.And a final question will any of the reviews be for future releases (hehe this is a cheeky one I know lol)Other than that I am ready to recieve the new review type spinnable articles as soon as you can start pushing them out.Just to reiterate a point that Vita made in his small pitch for this enhanced service the articles will still produce as much benefit for your IM related promotion with the added benefit of some sales and since your average commission is likely to be around $30 and you will have likely 30-40 versions if not more of each daily review then I would say even at a conservative estimate you should make at least 15 sales per month may be more as time goes on and your networks grow in power. So thats a potential extra $450 per month for a one time submission of a review. Does that not cover all your monthly service costs for software hosting etc etc ….This is a real no brainer folks .Regards Ron
Quality is key – so option 1 for me.(Or if possible add $20 to the price and keep membership to 100!)With the amount of spin in the articles 200-300 members shouldn't be too much of a problem, imho).Will the future spinnable PRoduct reviews be part of the $77 IM package or will it be a seperate membership? Don
Hi Ron,I do understand what you are meaning.But the reality that is that you get more competitors.I am for more than 15 years working as an internet and software specialist.The internet is not endless. That's a hoax.I only hear stories about endless possibilities, but nobody can prove it.What goes down from the offline market can go up to the online market.But it's still the same product. Only the logistics are different.More and more articles, products etc. etc. are the same.Endless is not the same as: more of the same stuff!So, be careful what you own and don't let everybody swim in your pool.Anyway, I wish everybody the best possibilities.Raymond
The articles that are coming now are great and save me and i'm sure most of you that pay for this service a lot of time… Now to have these articles better written? wow… fantastic… so what if there is another 200 people with the same article… there are that many variations i can't see it being an issue… So option 1 for me…
Hi Vita Vee,I am happy to see that you have come up with a solution for your articles. I am all for option 1 simply because I don't have the time to re-write a bunch of articles! I think option 1 is a Greattttt idea!Dave
option 1 is the way to go.
Are these product review articles replacing our current general IM niche ones? So we wouldn't be getting anymore article on article marketing, email marketing, ppc, etc?If that is the case then I vote no. As in the last pole, this is what we signed up for.
Hi Vita,I definitely prefer option 1 as having product review articles is fantastic. What a time saver!!!Thanks.Michel
Hey Ron, Glad you like this option
About your questions:>>> I have one question tho will it be purely IM product reviews from clickbank as per example or will it be from other sources also. <<<From other sources also. There are some great products with private affiliate programs or even some other very interesting networks.>>> Another question I have is will it switch to only product reviews or will you still include a mix of pure IM articles also because although there are many affiliate networks offering IM products sooner or later you will run out of products to review. <<<I was thinking of producing only reviews but nothing is definitive yet so it all depends on what the majority wants 
>>> Also will the reviews be of products that are closed now such as many of the high end products eg the recent "magic bullet system" which would only have backlink benefit not product sales benefits. <<<No. We would not review such products. Even if many of them are great, the fact that there is a limited number of spots would be a problem for us.>>> And a final question will any of the reviews be for future releases (hehe this is a cheeky one I know lol) <<<Yes, I was thinking about doing this 
Hi Raymond,Thanks for your comment but I think you don't look at it the right way. It's possible that some other members think the same thing as you so let me explain it as clearly as I can.What are the benefits of the current articles?Their only benefits is that they allow us to build thousands of backlinks all coming from unique content. What are the disadvantages of the current articles:Some grammatical errors and spellings here and there.Now let's see the advantages of the new articles:They also allow us to build thousands of backlinks all coming from unique content.Plus they allow us to make some direct affiliate sales (not only from Google, but rather from the sites they are published on).Plus they are very well written (Topics written by writers having a good experience with Internet Marketing + Several American writers to build the spins) Disadvantages of the new articles:They cost much more to produce.Now if we stay with the current articles you will only be able to get backlinks from them.If we go with the new articles you have the same benefits + some others. You don't lose any benefit! Your backlinks will still come from unique content even if we are 300 members.300 members could build thousands of unique variations per day without running into any duplicate content issue with the other members.
Don I don't know yet if there are going to be 2 distinct memberships or if I will just replace the current articles by the reviews. It will depend on all the feedback I receive. But if only 10 people or so want to keep the articles as they are right now it would of course not justify the cost of 2 distinct memberships.
Thanks Peter. Absolutely, I'm limiting this to 300 and this is well below the potential those articles are offering. But let's stay on the safe side.
Hi DaveThanks a lot
With Mohammed we are working very hard to have a quality service in place.
Jack this is what I had in mind because we get more benefits with such review articles. As I said in a reply to Raymond we don't lose any benefit compared to the previous articles. A review about a product called Reality PPC for example would be used for your ppc marketing network. A review about a product called Keyword Elite 2 for example would be used for your keyword research network and so on…
I also think so.
Ok I would be ok with that. My next concern though would be that if I were promoting a product that was in the ppc niche and the article was for Reality PPC. The article would go on to say how great Reality PPC is but then I would put a sentence in to have my anchor text with "You should really get Jack's PPC Formula". How would that look?
Hi Vita Vee,Let's say it this way.There are many ways to Rome.The facts are: how more people are doing the same thing, how less money you can make.That's what my calculator says, that's what my bookkeeper says, that's what the bank says.We can't change mathematics because of opinions right?1,000,000 USD market : 100 = 10,000 pp1,000,000 USD market : 300 = 3,333 ppOf course I do understand that not everybody is doing the same, but a lot people are doing the same.- That's why people will/need to pay to be on top at Google.- That's why you need all those links.- That's why you need good articles.How more people how more competition.I prefer to share my revenues with 10 people in stead of 100.Anyway, humans are thinking different and that's the fun part of it
Besides this, the articles are already great and sometimes you need to change them a little bit. That's fine.I am NOT here to say no to new possibilities.Interesting words:Facts with imagination are the spirit to make it happen.Raymond
I think I can answer that one you don't refer to your ppc product in that particular article just use relevant anchor text such as "PPC". I know that works for me certainly in a launch I am in right now I am on page one and climing to the top and I have only used the actual product name as anchor text a handfull of times all the other anchor text I use is IM general or specific topics.I think thats the way to go regarding that possible issue.Regards Ron
IM is a very broad subject & just about any link used in the resource box will be sufficient to get the backlink & can be used with hundreds of different kewyords on hundreds of niches.Specific product articles are a different matter. There are probably only 10-15 really good keywords available on a specific product. Granted, 300 people probably won't be pursuing the same product, but even if only 50 promote it then there is going to be quite a fight for those 15 spots. Trying to displace those 15 who are already there, without a fight, will not be easy either. I'm inclined to vote #2, but either way I will be content with the final vote result. The articles are great for the backlinks no matter which niche or product you pursue.
Another thought you could just add a comparison paragraph/sentence with your product specific anchor text."There are many ways to skin a cat and as long as it ends up skinned they are all the right way to skin a cat"Ron
Also, if I were promoting a product in the article marketing niche but my article was for the ppc niche. These articles would seem to be great for networks but a little difficult to manage for promoting any IM niche product from any article for submissions to services like MAN because it would look funny to be talking about the benefits of one product but promoting something totally different.
Ron, it's imperative that we use anchor text for the term that we want to rank for.
Raymond I totally agree with you about mathematics
But the point I was trying to make with my reply above is that we would not lose any benefit by using reviews at all. Let's imagine that NONE of us make any direct affiliate commission with those reviews. Then what does happen? We would still get thousands of backlinks coming from unique content – exactly like what we have with the current articles, with one important difference though: the articles are much better quality, no editing needed.
You can do it the way Ron is doing it or you also have some other alternatives if you want to use the exact product name.From your example above, if you are using an article about Reality PPC and want to promote PPC Classroom. You could easily add a sentence like:"Reality PPC is perfect for advanced pay per click marketers. But if you are just starting out or don't have the budget for this course then a program like PPC Classroom would probably be more useful to you."
Which would be why I added the second comment to cover that aspect !As for cross promoting one product type to another with a few minutes thought it is not difficult to construct a sentence or even a paragraph to bridge the gap.For example say the review is for Reality PPC and you where promoting Keyword Elite….." Pay Per Click is a vast and subjective area of expertise and one of the fundamental areas that people fall down on is proper keyword research, to that end I have found that Keyword Elite is an excellent tool to help in this instance."I think that took me all of 60 seconds…I totally understand where you are coming from all I am trying to say is there is nearly always a way around it and still remain totally relevant.Regards Ron
Thanks Bill for your comment.I think I was not clear enough in my post. The goal of these Ultra Spinnable Reviews is not to have them ranked on the first page of Google. The main goal is to use them to build backlinks coming from unique content to have our own websites on the top 3 of Google.The eventual direct affiliates sales we would make from them would probably not come from someone searching for the exact product name on google, they would rather come from the visitors of the thousands of sites where our articles are published. Some of those sites have good or even sometimes very high traffic.
How would I do that three times in an article I will be submitting to MAN with varying anchor text ( product name, product name review, and product name bonus)?
Let's expand on my sentences above."Reality PPC is perfect for advanced pay per click marketers. But if you are just starting out or don't have the budget for this course then a program like PPC Classroom would probably be more useful to you. On top of that I have found an offer that could potentially make it more attractive than Reality PPC and you can find it on this page: PPC Classroom Bonus (put your link) – If you are interested you can get more details in this PPC Classroom review (put your link)."
Maybe you don't promote as much as I do Ron. I would have to come up with tons of sentences like that to cover just one day, besides the brain power trying to think of different ways to say it. The advantage we are getting from the current articles is that they save us such work.
For the record, I am against this and I voted option 2, besides the fact that this isn't what we signed up for. I hope we will still have what we have. As far as quality, yes quality is nice, but the quality we have is more than good enough for our purposes. A member has said that ezinearticles accepted some of them and they have been known to be picky. We are not trying to rank with these, I don't care if anyone ever reads them. They are a DAMN good source for generating backlinks (the best).Having said that, if we go to the new service:1) These articles are simply unbeatable and a God-send and would still be useful.2) They will still in the IM niche.3) Vita, I know you are trying to improve this service and I really, truly appreciate that.
Possibilities on the internet are not endless.It's like a game: someone is winning, another one is losing.That's the hard reality.On Google are only 15 spots on the first page.Everything is like the “normal” world, it's just digital.So, keep this in mind.Old situation100 = 100 members15 = available spots on Google, on the first page15 : 100 = 0,15 x 100 = 15% change to be in the top 15 of GoogleNew situation?300 = 300 members15 = available spots on Google, on the first page15 : 300 = 0,05 x 100 = 5% change to be in the top 15 of GoogleHow more competition how less change.I would not like to pay the same fee with 3 times more competition.The amount of articles is not leading anymore, when you get 300% competitors.In this case: How more exclusive the member club is, how better for the members.Raymond
Vita Vee, Yes, I agree with you.Raymond
And I'm sure that I will find it very useful (and profitable) to actually promote some of these products. But since they are going to be high quality, wouldn't we use them to rank with? Like using them on our own sites?
Your Figures are sound Raymond except for one flaw.They depend on the simple fact that every single subscriber to the service is promoting the exact same product with the exact same keywords using the exact same strategy.Now considering that I know for a fact this is simply not the case and whilst I respect that you have concerns over this.This has to be taken into consideration when assessing the statistics not everyone is using these articles to promote the product launch model.That is only one possibility that they can be used for I know of at least one other person that has made themselves known to be using these articles to promote something completely outside the IM arena.The possibilities are endless !!Also to address your concern about exclusivity a conservative estimate of Internet Marketer numbers I think would be around 500,000 worldwide (and I really think that is very conservative since I could probably find at least that many in the Uk alone if I were willing to try)So based on that number 300 as a % of 500,000 is something like 0.06 % I would say that is pretty exclusive.No offense or malice is intended but I do think using fixed statistics making an assumption is not a valid way to argue anything.Regards Ron
Jack I would like to know what is the reason that made you vote "no"? Do you think that 300 members would saturate the uniqueness level of those articles or is it because you prefer generic articles instead of product reviews?
Hi everyone Read most of the comments, very interesting , however as a newbie (1st month) on Vid #6 of O to profits and never spun any of the articles the Vita has sent me so far, therfore I can not comment either way on the merits of Vita's offer, only to say this discussion helps clarify things for me about exactly what is on offer with the pros and cons. So thank you for that input appreciated. There is no "I don't know" selection so I think option 1 gets my vote on balance on the basis that the offer implies the following 1) quality is improved 2) the cost will be the same as now because there will be an increase in members from 100 to 300 to pay for improved quality 3) Generates backlinks function is same as current , 4)Possible extra bonus of small amounts of generated affilate income (if this could build to=$77/month or more then this service would essentially be free as compared to current 100 members. I know I have made alot of assumptions here, since I have not yet used the current service, however based on the fact that no one has said the current serivce is not up to it, indeed the reverse is true, I can only think improved article quality was a noted request in Vita's email box, hence why we are here voting today on his attempt to offer the requested improvements with some changes. regards Paul
Thanks a lot Paul for your detailed comment.The 4 bullets you cited are to the point.
I do not think it would be too many members. I know the power of these things and the ability of them to be used over and over again.It's the generic ones that I want. It would make it much easier for me to insert simple sentences like "There is a fantastic new course called Niche Blueprint that promises to change the way we view internet marketing" without having to go into an explanation on why I'm promoting a diferent product than the one I'm reviewing – up to three times per article.
Hi MichelThanks. I hope the majority will vote for this option (at the time of writing this, it is largely the case but less than 50% have voted now… It's still very early in some other parts of the world)
A very interesting situation and it took me all of 0.001 second to make my decision…I voted for option 1…..I see it this way. We are trying to build back links……so at the moment the only real important article or post that we want to have read is the one on our own sites…..right?……It is not really relevant if our posts are read on our networks but that we receive the necessary backlinks. Of course the posts have to be readable and make sense. We take an article about PPC and use it to link to our own post about PPC marketing and of course, the product we are promoting. What is then the difference with the review articles? They would still give us the necessary markets ( PPC, Niche Marketing, SEO etc… ) and backlinks ( even possibly couple of sales!!! ) and that is the true nature of what we are doing isn't it…driving OUR sites to the top of Search Engines.Option 1 for me has far more "money making" potential than option 2 and both options are designed for BACKLINKING. I don't see the problem but I do see the advantage.There is maybe a solution to this Vita…..Mix and Match ( for want of a better phrase! )You could provide us with BOTH types of articles, 4 from the review articles and 3 from the IM. We all know that there are Millions of possibilities with the ultra spinnable articles, so duplicate content is never going to be a problem…..it's all about the BACKLINKS guys and gals……and it's only partially to do with the articles. Maybe you should do another vote
Eager to know the final results.Dave B
Folks, I've reconsiderd. I will be ok with the new service. (It looks like my one little vote wasn't going to matter anyway). I know we will still be able to use these just fine for product launches and the quality will be such that we could use them on our own websites. And we could acutally use them to promote the products themselves.So Vita Vee, you can change my vote!
Hi Vita, option 1, 100%. (although it'll mean more work for you in the forum
)This is good news. The current articles are good but the spinning is not so good, and as every blog network, social network, etc, is increasing quality requirements every day more, I think our common interest is really to produce the highest quality content possible.Anne
Anne I also think this is in our interest to increase the quality, this would ensure almost 100% acceptance rate on any network and any article directory.
Hi Vita,I just voted for Option 1 as quality will always win out for me – plus being product reviews they are now much more targeted.Is it possible to have an Option 3, ie the new quality product review articles with say 150 members and a price increase, ie. my real preference would be to have the best quality articles with the least number of members while keeping the price reasonable?
WOW, I have to GREATLY APOLOGIZE Jack. The comment was made in jest and it's intent humorous. I guess it didn't come off that way, so sorry, I didn't mean to write that the way you took it. But all my other positions stand.I'll work it out one way or another. I just think general has more uses than product launch specific.
I think this is a great surprise, as I see this is a real bonus to our subscription, greatly improves the quality and expands our options, we can now drive traffic to our website and promote products directly, without effort!!. It is a great deal. You have my vote Vita.
Hi Vita and Everyone I have read all the replies that are further down this page on this debate between General IM articles and Specific product review articles and as a newbie I am finding the debate very interesting and the arguements for and against the change has open my eyes to other subtle slants to the survey questions that I had not considered and I have now changed my mind and reverse my vote from option 1 to 2. The views that changed my mind were the points made by Donald Sutherland mainly and Dante.Vita my I suggest that the problem here is not General IM articles verses Specific product review articles, 100 members verses 300 members and cost verses quality, but that your survey questions are not specific enough and with all the varibles just muddies the waters as highlighted by the wide variations of comments. However what is aboslutely clear from the debate that everyone seems happy with the current product, even if the quality may be a slight issue, althought a good number appear to want product review articles aswell.So I would like to suggest that you "do not fix what is clearly not broken" and do a new survey to improve your current great product, General IM articles. On your current product offer General IM articles you could ask members to vote on improved article quality, would their want to keep membership limited to 100 members and pay extra or increase membership to 300 and pay the same?Do a second survey on Specific product review articles to guage the viability of offering this service as a standalone or as an addition to what they currently have. I hope my comments have been constructive, surveys are not an easy thing to do, you just have to treat then like a solicitor, ask only one question at a time if you want a clear answer in return, because each question always has 2 answers, so to ask more questions increases the combinations of possible answers, just like you article spinner. I would be interested to know what other people thing!Regard Paul
Jack your a whimp, you should have stuck to your guns. Sorry, I left you alone… (I just got the email). My 2cents…I would vote yes for option 1 under one stipulation. The articles were kept general! For Me, I can twist and turn the general articles in all sorts of directions! For example, lets say I have a PPC article one day but I'm promoting something that deals with natural seo. I can add one little teaser at the end and turn the entire positive article on PPC into something that puts natural search into an even better light. like: “blah, blah, blah, PPC good stuff article” then add to the end “But if you really want to experience the Power of PPC without paying a DIME, discover the free natural serp secret”..Yes I know I could also do this with the review, but it would be even more work! I'd have to find product name and change, change the context of the surrounding sentence, THEN REPEAT THIS FOR EVERY VARIATION OF THE SPIN, BEFORE IT IS SPUN. I'm all for increased quality, but I'm not for extra work. I do see the pro's and cons on each side, but maybe this might make more sense as I'm thinking off the top of my head.When we do market research we typically find the market, then drill down to get into a niche in that market. Now when I say drill down we are hopefully DECREASING THE AMOUNT OF COMPETITION THAT WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH IN ORDER TO INCREASE OUR RANKINGS IN THE ENGINES. Now previously I read above that math is math and the numbers are what they are. So if this is the case this must also be true…IF GOING INTO A NICHE (MAKING THINGS SMALLER) CAN HELP US COMPETE, THE INVERSE IS ALSO TRUE, MEANING: If the only thing that you are doing with the articles is product launches then option 1 and changing all of them to reviews is a good thing. BUT IF YOU HAVE A BROAD RANGE OF AREA TO PROMOTE, NOT JUST PRODUCT LAUNCHES, AND YOU TAKE AWAY PART OF MY RESOURCES (MAKE THEM SMALLER), i EITHER HAVE TO WORK HARDER, OR LIMIT MY MARKET AND REACH FROM WHAT I HAVE PREVIOUSLY DONE BECAUSE I DO NOT HAVE THE SAME TOOLS. (sorry for all the caps and possible drama in text but I wanted some things to stand out).So to finish so I can go start promoting, I vote yes for quality, no for all reviews. I would go for a mix of the 2 OR I would pay a little more to keep the numbers down.No matter how I look at it, it just seems like more work for me if I'm on schedule to promote a course on article marketing and what I'm getting is a review for PPC classroom. Just getting links is good enough for me. I always rank on page one if I put any effort into the promotion and I want people to come to MY money page so I can build a relationship, get them on my list. The couple of sales that I may make from a feeder site is not worth it to me to not get them to my page. Ok , enough, I hope this rambeling made “some” sense. I'm not going to hold back a group, but I can do more with these than just product launches.
OK, I voted for option 1.My reasoning is as follows:Currently when I spin the articles, even though the quality is superior to most first written articles, I spend perhaps 30 minutes editing the results. When I take a spun and edited article to copyscape ro check it's uniqueness to the net I am seldom less than 98% unique. When checking the spun and edited article to the original spun and unedited article I seldom get less than 75% uniqueness. I believe that no matter how well written the spinable article is, it will require editing to meet my particular set of standards. Each spun and edited article will result in a slightly different set of LSI keywords being present in the article, not to mention a significant difference in supported primary Keywords. With this in mind I feel that, without regard to the number of members using the same original spinable article, that there is a significant number of unique keyword groups that will support the article and make it possible to have not just 10 spots available on Google but 10 to the tenth power. Remember we are talking about trillions of possible resulting mostly unique articles form the original spinable product. I don't see why there wouldn't be millions of possible keyword combination's as well.Having the variety of articles that can be spun to create an unending supply of mostly unique articles is priceless to me. I do agree that if all of the articles are just review articles, it will limit the uniqueness and the available Google front pages to a mere few thousands. So I would humbly ask that the articles would be a mix of types. And please don't forget real product reviews, like chairs, cameras, toys, electronic devices, etc…I look forward to the results of this survey.Donald
Well Dante I don't appreciate being called a whimp whatever that is. (I've heard of a wimp, is that you Dante?). Maybe I did back down. That doesn't mean I've changed how I feel about it. I STILL WISH WE WERE GETTING WHAT WE ORIGINALLY SIGNED UP FOR. These articles were designed with Vita's “From 0 to Profits” course in mind. That's what it should be.But I do see other benefits of what Vita wants to do with these things. I could probably use them for other purposes as well as product launches. At least they’re in the IM niche.So Vita, you know how I feel but go ahead and change them if you want.
Hey Dante, no problem bro. I did take offense to that a bit and I shouldn't have so I apologize. This has turned in to quite a hot topic! I probably got a bit upset by that maybe because in some way you are right. (not about being a wimp
but about me not sticking to my guns when maybe I should have.I really have been flip-flopping on this issue. I do like the way the service is right now. Paul’s point may be right on the money. “Don’t fix what ain’t broke.” One problem here is that it’s not like Vita can just say “ok I’ll just start up another service for product reviews or other niches” Vita and Mohammed have worked hard just to come up with writers who are willing to do the job. His first team came to him and said “this is just too much, we can’t do it, sorry.” So for now at least we may be looking at only one service until such time as he can find more people to do this work. Can one type of service please everybody? No. Vita originaly set up this service because he had a group of people who were killing themselves to come up with spinnable articles for product launches. He was able to provide this service to us for that purpose. Thank you Vita!Now he is trying to improve things to help us further and I appreciate that. So I’m going to let him decide. Whatever he thinks, as far as I’m concerned, is ok (except for those non-IM ones )
Good Idea 300 is a very small number cosidering that not everybody does what they are suppose to do. The 80/20 rule also applys to the use of the articles.
I understand the difficulty that some people are having with the decision, I feel the same way as I can accept both points of view. (Does this mean the answer should not be 'either /or', but 'and' ).No, my concern, and please try to convince me it's unfounded, is what will be the reaction of the moderator/webmaster of the target sites when he/she is deluged with not IM generic material,but suddenly a load of product-specific material. “Do I need 17 even different articles on cbp, or 23 on nb2? Nah, one will be enough at the moment”.Are my fears baseless? Thought I'd ask, as no one else has yet…
Thanks a lot Paul, yes your comments are very useful and I will probably have to make another survey. I hope it's not going to become annoying to have surveys after surveys
Great point here!
Thanks to all of you for your votes and extremely interesting comments. I thought option 1 was the best possible deal and that I would get close to 100% of your votes for that one. It's not the case though.50 have voted for option 120 have voted for option 2I wish we could go for the 1st option but with 20 who voted for the other one I do really need to reconsider my plans.Will make another post tomorrow and I will probably need your opinion once again. I apologize in advance but I think this is much better that we decide all together what to do with this service – I'm trying to make it as useful and as good as possible.VV